Aloha e Nä Hoaloha,
As you may already know, a small group of lessees who hold agriculture leases with Kamehameha Schools in Kamilonui - East Honolulu are protesting lease rent increases that we have proposed and consider to be fair. We have been negotiating with the lessees since March, and while we continue to meet with them, we are also proceeding with arbitration, which is the process provided for in our lease agreements. We believe the arbitration process is a fair one. A three-member arbitrator’s panel, selected by the lessees and Kamehameha Schools, will determine a fair lease rent structure based on comparable parcels in the area. We respect the arbitrators’ expertise and will abide by their findings.
The lessees have taken their cause to the media, suggesting that the proposed lease rent increase is too high and jeopardizes their futures. The news media appear to have accepted the lessees’ characterization of this process, so we wanted to share our side of the story and hope that you can help us by being advocates. Here are some facts about the issue:
1. KS has abides by all of the requirements of the lease contracts signed 38 years ago, even if those requirements did not favor Kamehameha’s interests.
2. One of those requirements was that rents would not be increased from that time until July 1, 2010.
3. This has resulted in lease rents for the last 38 years amounting to $15/acre per month (which includes the right to reside on the property). Clearly this amount is far below market value and far below what is a fair return for KS today.
4. The lease rent proposed by KS is about $434/acre per month. Although this is a significant increase from $15/acre, the amount is still low and very fair especially considering the residential element.
a. As a comparison, the State Department of Agriculture recently completed a bid process for agricultural acreage in Waimänalo that resulted in leases, for bona fide farmers, of approximately $460/acre per month.
b. KS has also already settled lease rents with several of the other agricultural lessees in the area who have agreed to KS’ lease rent offers.
5. A majority of the current lessees are not currently farming the minimum requirement of 50% of their properties.
6. Although subleasing is not allowed under the current agreement, several lessees are allowing others to use the property – and charging them for it. Two of these sublessees are not farming at all; we’ve also been told that one sublessee pays $1,875/acre per month. That means that their landlord (our lessee) is making a significant profit by subleasing our agricultural land for residential use.
a. Recognizing that subleasing to bona fide farmers could allow current lessees to generate additional income to offset their new market rent, KS is offering to allow subleasing for bona fide agricultural use in the new leases.
7. Several leases are in violation – using the land as dumping grounds of abandoned vehicles, scrap metals and discarded plastics.
Unfortunately, a group of the lessees who accepted the favorable terms of the lease agreement for nearly four decades, did not use the long stretch of very low lease rents to prepare for the eventual readjustment to fair market rates. As you know, we have a fiduciary duty to ensure that our lands provide the income critical to our ability to fulfilling our educational mission. We also have kuleana for the stewardship of our lands, and we take our kuleana very seriously.
Please help us be ambassadors for our mission and our children. We would like to call on you to advocate for a fair and impartial resolution of this issue. We believe that will be accomplished through the arbitration process. Please let us know by email at land@ksbe.edu if you are willing to kokua this effort. Mahalo nui ia `oukou,
Ann Botticelli, Vice President
Community Relations & Communications Group
P.S. We’ve also included (below) a quick-reference fact sheet regarding our Kamilonui lease issues. Mahalo for your consideration.
KAMILONUI FACT SHEET
11/17/2010
Lease history and current background
• For the past 38 years, Kamilonui lessees have paid lease rents that have been far below fair market value; KS has abided by its agreement to not increase lease rents for Kamilonui lessees for that entire time.
• The average Kamilonui lease rent has been $15/acre per month.
• The lands have been used by lessees to generate income and for residential use.
• The leases require at least 50% of the property to be in Agricultural Use; however, fewer than a third of the lessees are currently meeting the agricultural use requirement, and several of the Kamilonui properties have limited or no agricultural activity at all.
• Although subleasing is not allowed under the current agreement, several lessees are subleasing or allowing others to use the property.
• One sublessee pays approximately $1,875/acre per month in rent to our lessee.
New Rent Negotiation Efforts
• The lease renegotiation period has been known since the leases were signed in 1970.
• KS has granted lessees several extensions of time during the lease negotiation period.
• KS has been meeting with the lessees and remains open to meeting with the lessees.
• KS’ offer to the lessees was approximately $434/acre per month:
o The offer included the right to sublease property for bona fide farm use;
o A residence is allowed on the property.
Arbitration is Next Step
• Several of the lessees have rejected KS’ offer; therefore, the new lease rent will be determined by an arbitration process that was contractually agreed upon when the leases were signed.
• Arbitration requires that the new lease rent be set by a 3-member panel of arbitrators:
o KS has named its arbitrator;
o Lessees are required to name their arbitrator by mid November;
o The two arbitrators will then decide on the third arbitrator.
• KS believes that its offers were fair but will abide by the result of the arbitration process.
• As a comparison, the State of Hawaii recently completed a competitive bid process for Agricultural lands in Waimänalo; the winning bids by bona fide farmers were approximately $460/acre/month.
• KS is seeking the same return as other comparable agricultural lands for its lands in Kamilonui.
• KS is seeking fair market rent – nothing more.
PLEASE NOTE:
You have received this email message as a graduate of Kamehameha Schools. If you wish to be removed from the email list, reply to this email and type UNSUBSCRIBE in the Subject Line, and include your name and graduation year. If you want to update your email address, please provide the following additional information to help ensure we update the correct record: Full Name, graduation year and street address.
November 15, 2010 at 1:51 am Great insight into a problem that I face on a regular bases. The CC of HNL has a Tax Review board. It’s always made me wonder if the landowners who ask for a decrease in their 2nd, 3rd and 4th or more properties ever give the leasees a break on their monthly rent prices. Some by the photos of the property are really slum lords. Welcome to the land of Aloha.
November 15, 2010 at 7:41 am Somewhere along the line, KS went from charitable trust to evil empire. It’s true that a lot of the lessees have gotten off with good deals, but I know a number of them who really are on a thin line and could be at least treated with some flexibility in the payments. However, KS is towing the hard line, probably to force these folks out and redevelop to get some of that fat, juicy, mainland money.
November 15, 2010 at 10:01 am oh, the rich get richer and the poor get children, in the meantime, in betweentime, aint we got fun.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.
Cliche Monday, I know….but what we see and what we get is how things go when we llive in a society where money talks and the rest of us walk.
Off to work – have a Good Monday everyone
November 15, 2010 at 10:21 am “Business is War”.
Not Kamehameha School itself but those who are trusted to run the School that are the ones to blame. It is again Business Persons who run Hawaii.
If you note in the article presented, The Same Politicians who are deciding on the fate of Kalihi are involved again. Are they being “paid” off by donations to cater to the “rich”?
I scratch your back, you scratch mine? The poor cannot afford a back scratcher!
November 15, 2010 at 11:12 am The State wants to help agriculture; step in and ‘condemn’ the farmland from KS/BE for $30/acre and then, negotiate a lease agreement with the farmers for slightly more per acre. The farmers, hopefully, won’t be stressed by a smaller increase of $15 to $32-35/acre compared to KS’s $434. Are the farmers using well water or paying for pumped in water? I guess land-owners always want incentive$ to keep agricultural lands in production but, why do some/most of them ‘ask for blood’ right off the bat’ instead of long-term vision toward sustained agricultural revenues? The Kamilonui Valley farmers seem to be in a ‘serf-like’ position….being asked/demanded to give all to the land-owner and hope for crumbs in return which seems doubtful in this situation.
November 15, 2010 at 2:18 pm Kamehameha Schools forwarded a copy of its full statement to the media:
November 15, 2010 at 4:45 pm KSBE’s media statement is contradictory. If the lessees are in violation of the lease such as subleasing, not using at least 50% for agriculture or using the land as a dumping ground then KSBE should warn, then evict the people who violate the lease. Lessee violations should have NOTHING to do with increasing rent for everyone, INCLUDING the families/groups or are abiding by all lease rules, NOT using slave labor like Aloun farms, providing food for Hawaii residents and making a modest profit to continue on with their farming business.
Also the difference in additional rent money collected by KSBE for the old lease rates with the higher lease rates for all 87 acres as identified by press release adds up to less than $260,000 more per year, which is chump change to KSBE. You get the feeling that KSBE figures it is legally easier and less of a public relations nightmare** to just ‘throw out the baby with the bath water’ and impose a blanket rent increase for everyone as a more effective tool to kick out the bad tenants once and for all. The legitimate tenants who are efficient and can make good use of KSBE land to farm can stay because only they will be able to comfortably abosrb the increase in their rent.
** Possible that some of the renters who are abusing their rental agreement with KSBE will try to get the local media to paint them as the “victims” who are now being kicked out of their “homes” by the “greedy” KSBE. Seems KSBE is using a preemptive strike to get it out to the public that some of these renters are not all “innocent victims”.
November 16, 2010 at 6:58 am The lessees submitted a proposed lease rent based on the Income Capitalization method of valuing land. KS, and the other large landowners in Hawaii , have relied on Sales Comparison as their exclusive method for valuation. This allows them to hold their land for income (rent) yet value it at speculative levels as if it were for sale, which it is not.
The local appraisers ignore the federally mandated principles contained in USPAP ( it uses “should” instead of “shall”) to the detriment of the lessees, who are the farmers and small businesses of Hawaii.
The basic principle of choosing a methodology for appraisal is that it should reflect the actions of the market participants. If they are speculators or investors then Sales Comparison or Replacement Value is most appropriate. If they are seeking rent then the Income Approach is called for.
But not in Hawaii.
November 16, 2010 at 10:18 am Math correction:
Current:
($185/acre-yr)*(87 acres)=$16,095/yr
KSBE proposed:
($434/acre-mnth)*(87 acres)*(12 mnth/yr)= $453,096/yr
Difference:
$437,001/yr
Still chump change to KSBE but that is salary for at least one KSBE lobbyist
November 16, 2010 at 2:44 pm ppcc, re: “…at least one KSBE lobbyist”
I was haunting the Capitol this past session, and in the process interviewed some registered lobbyists. One was a former KSBE contractor and they advised me that post “Broken Trust” KSBE had released all their formal contracts and were basically AWOL from the Leg. Too much scrutiny of their past bad behaviors had lead to hyper sensitive current trustees. Hence, no active lobbyists on the floor.
BUT…I just had another talk with a lobbyist who advised me that KS is currently taking proposals from lobbyists for active representation in the next session. So, if in fact they ever really left, what with alumni sprinkled throughout elected and administrative positions, it seems like they’ll be back to politicize their interests once again. I guess 10 years or so was long enough in purgatory.
This lobbyist advised me that KSBE was highly concerned about leasehold reform, and the HRPT success in having ACT 189 overturned had apparently emboldened them. They want to nip in the bud any attempts to change the status quo. I guess LURF and the other secondary representation is not enough.
Have you ever wondered what a Dynastic Trust looks like? Well, I checked their latest reported 2008 results:
9.44 billion 2008 up from 9.05 billion in 2007, thus they earned 435 million that year with Total Expenditures for ALL activities 273 million or less than 3% of assets. A Dynastic trust can keep increasing their portfolio basis by earning more than they spend with no statutory limit to the life of the trust. They have announced their portfolio is down to the 7+ billion range in 2010, but their income should be holding steady.
And thanks to the farmers of Hawaii Kai, maybe even going up!